Walter
Harvey Ehrich
Corrupt Magistrate for Police Fraud
& Armed Robbery & Theft
EXPLAIN YOURSELF, Ehrich!
You CHEATING PARASITE.
|
Mafioso Cop aka PIG [oink] Henri Elias Rantala |
Corrupt Judiciaries & Corrupt Magistrates [many more to come]: |
Corrupt CMC & Corrupt Police Interaction: Statutory Declaration by Dr Christine Eastwood: |
Corrupt Magistrates |
BEWARE of CrimeStoppers: HONEST CITIZENS are conned to Aid POLITICAL & POLICE CORRUPTION |
Reg.
Office: 254
Hawken Drive, St Lucia, Qld. 4067, Australia.
Editor-in-Chief: Russell G H Mathews BCom BSc
LLB BA EMAIL your
advice:
using
LAWYERS Stephen Tonge & Flower & Hart LAND FRAUD & Armed Robbery
Armed Robbery & Egregious Magistrate Walter Ehrich then Stephen Tonge's Fraud for Rev John Morgan
OPEN
LETTER:
2010/08/09
Chief
Justice
Paul
de
Jersey
EXPOSE
the
Anglican
FRAUD!!
OPEN
LETTER:
2010/08/05
Stephen
John
Tonge,
Flower
&
Hart,
&
Tress
Cox re Stephen Tonge FRAUD:
OPEN
LETTER:
2010/08/05
Stephen
John
Tonge,
Flower
&
Hart,
&
Tress
Cox re Stephen Tonge FRAUD
Federal Election : Qld Court of Appeal exposes ;
Federal
Election SPECIAL: LNP FRAUD:
in Dickson
Qld's
Court of Appeal Exposes
Egregious conduct by Brisbane Magistrate
The topsy-turvy "Alice in
Wonderland" Magistrate
CLICK
HERE
Power
to
the
people: NOW, you can against public
sector
parasites, and . Take
Control
of
your
own
destiny:
Qld's Court of Appeal : Delivers a GLORIOUS DECISION
HOT VIDEOS:
Police
Brutality videos: Queensland & Australian
|
Mafioso Cop aka PIG [oink] Henri Elias Rantala |
Corrupt Judiciaries & Corrupt Magistrates [many more to come]: |
Corrupt CMC & Corrupt Police Interaction: Statutory Declaration by Dr Christine Eastwood: |
Corrupt Magistrates |
BEWARE of CrimeStoppers: HONEST CITIZENS are conned to Aid POLITICAL & POLICE CORRUPTION |
Audio messages to corrupt Australian Magistrate
20090713_1228GMTSecondMessageToWalterHarveyEhrichAndCriminalCohortHenriEliasRantala.ogg
My
First Message To CORRUPT Australian Magistrate, Walter Harvey Ehrich.ogg
Walter Harvey EHRICH
These are recorded in FREE Open Source Ogg Vorbis format. [It is
better and more space efficient => quicker download.] An
excellent TOTALLY FREE Open Source program called AUDACITY
IS
RECOMMENDED for playback.
Courthouse
Brisbane
<Courthouse.Brisbane@justice.qld.gov.au>
Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at
12:26 PM
To: Russell Mathews <concealed>
Dear Mr Mathews,
I write in reply to your below email regarding the order made by a
Brisbane Magistrate on 1st June 2005.
Using the hearing date you provided of 1st June 2005 a matter with the
following details was found:
Offence: Public Nuisance - 7AA Vagrants Gaming and Other Offences Act;
Offence date: 29th November 2004;
Offence place: o/s 254 Hawken Drive St Lucia
Crime/Crisp No: n/a
I wish to advise that according to our records Magistrate Ehrich on the
day of the hearing made a decision under section 19 of the Penalties
and Sentences Act of an absolute discharge - with no conviction
recorded.
I hope this satisfies your enquiry.
-----Original Message-----
From: Russell Mathews [mailto:<concealed>]
Sent: Saturday, 17 March 2007 11:47 AM
To: Courthouse Brisbane
Subject: AN IMPORTANT MATTER, the Police Minister Spence is now making
false statement in Writing,
Ron Micola,
Registrar,
Magistrates Court,
Brisbane.
Dear Sir,
I was charged with a Public Nuisance Offence. It was set down for
hearing on 1 June, 2005. The Magistrate on that day, without hearing
any evidence, viewed that this was an appropriate case for dismissal
without conviction. This is AN IMPORTANT MATTER, as the Police Minister
Spence is now saying, in Writing, that I was convicted with no
conviction being recorded.
I am hoping you can advise me the Identity of the magistrate who made
that decision and the section of, I think, the Justices Act, under
which he made that decision.
Please advise.
Kind regards,
***************************************************************
Russell G H Mathews BCom BSc LLB BA
Editor in Chief:
Australian Law Publishers Pty Ltd
http://austlawpublish.com/
[ACN 010 615 933]
Titles:
Australian
Criminal Law Journal [ISSN: 1321-6562] [ACLJ]
Australian
FOI Law Journal ISSN: 1834-5328 [AFOILJ]
ex-Member of the Standing Committee of Convocation of
The UNIVERSITY of QUEENSLAND
254 Hawken Drive, St Lucia Q4067.
Ph: NONE:I've given TELSTRA the FLICK. Hooray![Just email me.]
HAIG REPORT: the EVIDENCE
International
students BEWARE of Australian universities
The
"Judges are Corrupt" [WorldWide] Network.[members' links]
Russell
Mathews <concealed> Mon,
Mar 19, 2007 at 1:29 PM
To: Courthouse Brisbane
<Courthouse.Brisbane@justice.qld.gov.au>
Many thanks for your reply and for its being timely.
I had been able today to discover that it was an absolute discharge
under section 19 of the Penalties and Sentences Act 1992 [PSA].
Thank you for advice of the Magistrate's name. The police are now
saying that I was found guilty of that charge and discharged absolutely
with no conviction being recorded. Very soon after that time, the view
was expressed to me that Section 19 could not be applied without there
having been a hearing. I now suspect that Section 19 can be applied
only where there has been a hearing and guilt has been established, [or
if there has been a guilty plea]. This believe is based upon the
language of the section. It speaks only of "the offender", not the
defendant. I note, at the time, and this would be confirmed on the
recording of the appearance, there was no mention of "conviction" or
"guilt".
Does the record make any mention of "conviction" or "guilt"? I might
add, I was not asked at the time, if I was agreeable to
discharge/dismissal under Sect19 PSA. "Due Process" requires that I am
given the right to be heard in circumstances such as was these, this
charge, as well as the dismissal. I was not guilty, and the
police and the Brisbane City Council were illegally in my home. I had
subpoenaed many witness for that hearing. I had much to gain by there
being a hearing.
I will appreciate your advice of whether there was any mention of
"conviction" or "guilt"on the record.
Regards,
Russell Mathews.
Courthouse
Brisbane <Courthouse.Brisbane@justice.qld.gov.au>
Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 9:57 AM
To: Russell Mathews <concealed>
Dear Mr Mathews -
The court file for this matter notes that you appeared in person on 5th
June 2006 [Edit:
This is clearly false so what else is bogus? The date was DEFINITELY
1st June, 2005. It was the date on the notice to me and the date
that I placed on all the subpoenas that were registered and which
produced all the witnesses, except Morgan who
had solicitors write that he had no knowledge on the matter, whereas,
that lying parasite Rev
Canon Professor Dr [all in 'Theology' which is diametrically opposed to
'rocket science'] John Morgan knew so much and is a LIAR and
a
CHEAT.] It does not note your plea, however it does
state that the conviction was not recorded.
For further details about the court proceedings it may be possible for
you to request a court transcript of the decision upon application and
payment of the resulting fees.
